Nik Juarez and Escrow Kid - January 11, 2016. Photo by The Racing Biz.
Nik Juarez and Escrow Kid – January 11, 2016. Photo by The Racing Biz.

by Frank Vespe

Two prominent Maryland jockeys will be on the sidelines for at least the next couple of weeks as a result of suspensions handed down by the Maryland Racing Commission’s stewards.

Xavier Perez and Nik Juarez both ran afoul of the state’s drug-testing regime on January 15.

The stewards randomly choose races in which to test all the jockeys for drugs, and on that date, they chose a race including both Perez and Juarez.

 

Perez submitted a sample which contained the presence of amphetamines. Some riders use amphetamines to assist in weight loss, and Perez, coming off a three-day suspension for careless riding that concluded January 9, may have been seeking to reduce weight, sources said.

Juarez, according to the ruling, “failed to provide a specimen after signing an affidavit that he would provide one.”

According to the ruling, each rider is suspended “until such time as he has been professionally evaluated.”

Administrative steward Adam Campola said that what that means in terms of time can vary from person to person.  The process, he said, is that each rider must attend counseling and provide clean samples until the counselor determines that “there’s not a problem and not a detriment to safety.”  Once the counselor decides that the rider is able to come back, he said, the stewards would then hold a hearing to determine whether and when to allow it.

J.D. Brown, Perez’s agent, declined to comment.

 

Scott Silver, the agent for Juarez, similarly would not comment other than to express his hope that his jockey’s enforced absence “hopefully” wouldn’t be “too long.”

Perez, a journeyman who began riding in 2007, achieved his greatest success to date in 2013, when he teamed up with Dance to Bristol to win three graded stakes, including the Grade 1 Ballerina at Saratoga.  Perez also won the 2014 Grade 3 General George at Laurel Park aboard Bandbox.  Perez’s mounts won 67 times, earning more than $2.1 million, in 2015.  He had been winless thus far in 2016.

Juarez, who began his career in 2013, enjoyed a breakthrough season in 2015, when his mounts won 118 races and earned $3,028,617.  He also registered his first graded stakes score, when Valid took the Grade 3 Iselin at Monmouth Park.  Juarez began 2016 slowly but came to life when winning six races on Monday, January 11.

[author] [author_image timthumb=’on’]http://www.theracingbiz.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/fvandfred2.jpg[/author_image] [author_info]Frank Vespe, the founder of The Racing Biz, has owned, bought, sold, claimed, and written about horses, in varying combinations, for a decade.[/author_info] [/author]

7 Comments

  1. Virginia Horseman
    18th Jan 2016

    Absolutely UNACCEPTABLE for the stewards not to require Nik Juarez to provide a sample. Their irresponsible behavior in letting him off the hook gravely compounds the risk he poses to the other jocks in his races. Good luck getting that sample, stewards, until enough time has passed for everything to wash out of his system. Now he can truthfully claim “I never tested positive,” and eventually his refusal will be forgotten and swept under the rug. There is only ONE reason why he refused. This is not an issue of whether one jockey is using drugs, it is a matter of life and death for the other jockeys in his races. As for Xavier Perez, get clean, man, you have my respect for manning up, unlike that other toad.

    • The Biz
      18th Jan 2016

      To be clear, Horseman (and by the way, thanks for taking the time to read and comment – much appreciated) he didn’t “refuse” to take the test; he left the grounds without taking one.

      • Ted Maher
        18th Jan 2016

        That action constiutes a “refusal”.

      • Virginia Horseman
        19th Jan 2016

        Thanks for clarifying. From my first reading of the article it seemed he had refused and signed an affidavit saying he’d provide a sample later. “Leaving the grounds” when being asked for a test ought to be treated as testing positive, no half-measures. I am passionate about this issue because, as I said, hopped-up jocks aren’t just putting their own lives at risk, but also every other jock in the race.

    • Ted Maher
      18th Jan 2016

      The stewards did Order all the jockeys to submit to the testing. Persons may refuse. The stewards can go into the bathroom with him and force him to urinate. They are not police and do not have that authority. There will also be a adverse ruling and probably the same length of suspension as if he tested positive. So I would not consider the matter as being swept under the rug.

    • Xavier perez
      21st Jan 2016

      Thank you so much for your support

  2. Bill
    18th Jan 2016

    Grown men should not have to weigh 110 pounds to make a living. I’m sure at least 50% of jock colony has used some drug to keep weight off in their past , Sorry they got suspended.

Comments are closed.

Get The Racing Biz in your inbox!

Join our mailing list to get our latest news delivered to your inbox each week! And, by the way, we never sell our lists or share your info with outside parties.

You have Successfully Subscribed!